Theology Central

Theology Central exists as a place of conversation and information for faculty and friends of Central Baptist Theological Seminary. Posts include seminary news, information, and opinion pieces about ministry, theology, and scholarship.

Hate Crimes

The FBI reports that anti-Jewish crimes account for 58.2 percent of all religiously-motivated hate crimes in the United States. Only 16.3 percent of these crimes were directed at Muslims.

The Seven Spirits of God

Ever wonder about the seven Spirits before the throne of God (Rev. 1:4)? Or the seven Spirits of God possessed by Christ (Rev. 3:1)? Or the seven Spirits of God symbolized by the seven lamps of fire burning before the throne (Rev. 4:5)? Or the Lamb’s seven eyes that are the seven Spirits of God (Rev. 5:6)? Here’s the meaning.

The prophecy of the coming Messiah in Isaiah 11 begins with these words:

Then a shoot will spring from the stem of Jesse,
And a branch from his roots will bear fruit.
The Spirit of the LORD will rest on Him,
The spirit of wisdom and understanding,
The spirit of counsel and strength,
The spirit of knowledge and the fear of the LORD.

That’s a bunch of spirits. Count ’em.

  1. The Spirit of the LORD
  2. The Spirit of wisdom
  3. The Spirit of understanding
  4. The Spirit of counsel
  5. The Spirit of strength
  6. The Spirit of knowledge
  7. The Spirit of the fear of the LORD

Of course, these aren’t seven distinct Spirits, but one Holy Spirit in His seven-fold activity. This passage probably refers to the theocratic anointing that characterized Old Testament figures who led the nation of Israel. Messiah will possess this theocratic anointing in its fullness and perfection: the seven-fold Spirit of God.

Review: Reformations by Carlos M. Eire

Samuel Gregg writes a review of Carlos M. Eire’s Reformations: The Early Modern World 1450-1650. Here’s a sample.

The Reformation certainly didn’t simply spring from the mind of Martin Luther. But as a historical development, it has been the subject of polemics for 500 years: not just between Catholics and Protestants, but also, over the past century, between historians and sociologists with disparate views on how the modern world emerged. Any serious study of the Reformation’s origins and impact consequently requires a willingness to traverse a veritable minefield of longstanding theological and historiographical arguments.

Read more of this review at the Library of Law and Liberty.

Sola Scriptura or Papal Confusion?

Protestants (including Baptists) have insisted upon acknowledging Scripture alone as their authority for faith and practice. Catholics, who affirm the authority of the Magisterium and of the Pope speaking ex cathedra, have often pointed to divisions among Protestants as proof that Sola Scriptura is inadequate as a principle of authority. That argument has never been completely convincing, but it had more plausibility when Roman Catholicism seemed to be moving in a single direction under Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. Under Pope Francis, however, conservative Roman Catholics are having to do their own dance around Papal authority, which, it turns out, is not all one thing. In a perverse way, it’s funny to watch. You read about some of this dance in an article at First Things entitled “Creeping Infallibility.”

The Swinburne Controversy

Richard Swinburne is one of the most highly respected philosophers in the world. And he is a Christian, broadly orthodox, who has spent much of his career arguing for theism and Christianity.

Swinburne was invited to address the Midwest meeting of the Society of Christian Philosophers. His topic was “Christian Moral Teaching on Sex, Family, and Life,” including a discussion of homosexuality, of which Swinburne disapproves. He was invited to address this topic not only because of his stature as a philosopher, but because he had already written on it.

The backlash came almost instantly. For example, Edward Hackett wrote,

Yesterday, I gave Richard Swinburne, the famous Oxford Christian philosopher, a piece of my mind. . . . My response was mixture of abhorrence and overwhelming anger, and I tried as I might to encounter this idea calmly.

In the face of the backlash, SCP president Michael Rea of the University of Notre Dame posted the following to his Facebook account:

I want to express my regret regarding the hurt caused by the recent Midwest meeting of the Society for Christian Philosophers. The views expressed in Professor Swinburne’s keynote are not those of the SCP itself. Though our membership is broadly united by way of religious faith, the views of our members are otherwise diverse. As Preisdent of the SCP, I am committed to promoting the intellectual life of our philosophical community. Consequently (among other reasons), I am committed to the values of diversity and inclusion. As an organization, we have fallen short of those ideals before, and surely we will again. Nonetheless, I will strive for them going forward. If you have thoughts or feedback you would like to share with me, I would welcome hearing from you via email or private message.

Now the counter-backlash has set in. The philosophers at Rightly Considered have objected to Rea’s treatment of Swinburne. Journalist Rod Dreher at The American Conservative has written an excoriating article. Even Douglas Wilson has weighed in.

Most importantly, an open letter has been sent from sixty-three members to the leadership of the SCP. The letter calls for a formal apology to Swinburne.

A society of philosophers is supposed to be committed to open enquiry. If it is to be biased at all, one would think that a Society of Christian Philosophers would be biased toward Christianity and its values.

If there is a lesson here, it is that there is no safe space for speaking biblical morality.

 

Ludwig von Mises

Ludwig von Mises was one of the most important recent shapers of a conservative vision of economics. Read a quick introduction to him at the ISI.