Theology Central
Theology Central exists as a place of conversation and information for faculty and friends of Central Baptist Theological Seminary. Posts include seminary news, information, and opinion pieces about ministry, theology, and scholarship.Matt Holst Challenges “Patriarchy Movement”
Writing for the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals, Matt Holst challenges the contemporary Patriarchy Movement.
Popular now, for some thirty years, Christian Patriarchy, and its twin the “Quiver-full” movement, contain truths about headship, gender roles, and attitudes towards authority in the home. God has ordained such matters, but the question arises, what has God ordained concerning them?
Israel and the Temple Mount
Does Israel intend to change the status of the Temple Mount? Nadav Shagrai thinks that saying so should be illegal.
These accusations that the State of Israel is plotting to destroy the Al-Aqsa mosque or is conspiring to change the status quo on the holy site are blatant lies. Israel has no intention whatsoever to harm Al-Aqsa. As for the status quo, that has indeed changed dramatically — and now it grossly discriminates against Jews.
Canadian Baptists Contemplating Baptism
Ten years ago, John Piper attempted to convince Bethlehem to allow for non-immersed believers to be members. The plan never succeeded. Recently the Canadian Fellowship of Evangelical Baptists discussed doing the same thing. Read about it here.
http://www.fellowship.ca/MembershipBaptism
A Baptist church that doesn’t insist on immersion is like Roman Catholicism with no pope. Roman Catholicism without the pope is . . . Anglicanism. Baptists who permit sprinkling are . . . no longer Baptists, whatever they call themselves.
Bunyan: A Short Video Biography
Ryan Reeves or Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary offers a nice, little eight-minute biography of John Bunyan. View it on Youtube.
Agree to Disagree?
Trevin Wax at Kingdom People addresses the question of whether “traditionalists” and “revisionists” on sex and marriage can coexist within the same Christian organizations. Here’s his conclusion:
As the Sexual Revolution wreaks havoc in the lives of people around us, Christians have the opportunity to proclaim the Scripture’s moral clarity–not as a barrier to the faith, but as the beacon of light in a morally chaotic world. To be faithful in this time, the Church must be a haven of hope, a refuge in the midst of sexual chaos. We won’t be able to do that if we think the way forward is “agreeing to disagree.”
Evidence for Christianity
From Tozer:
There is another kind of evidence. It is the immediate evidence of the inner life. That is the evidence by which you know you are alive. If I were to prove that you weren’t alive, you would chuckle and go home just as alive as you are now and not a bit worried about it, because you have the instant, unmediated evidence of internal life. Jesus Christ wanted to take religion out of the external and make it internal and put it on the same level as life itself, so that a man knows he knows God the same as he knows he is himself and not somebody else. He knows he knows God the same as he knows he is alive and not dead. Only the Holy Ghost can do that. The Holy Spirit came to carry the evidence of Christianity from the books of apologetics into the human heart, and that is exactly what He does.
Tozer, A. W. How to Be Filled with the Holy Spirit (Kindle Locations 232-238). Kindle Edition.
The Danger of Dispensationalism
What’s wrong with the world? Turns out, it’s dispensationalism. Who knew?
Sadly, this understanding creates not only complete and utter apathy, but something far worse. Sure, there is apathy for the environment, and apathy for humanity, but, like a double-edged sword, also a promulgation of the very things dispensationalists believe must take place before the end can come, before they can go to their party in the sky.
Read more from Matthew Distefano at Unfundamentalist Christians.
Snoeberger on Literal Interpretation
Mark Snoeberger is a professor at our sister institution, Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary. He has written has a useful post on literal interpretation. He highlights two problems: first, a danger that literal interpreters face, and second, the problem of nomenclature. He finds a template for addressing the second problem in Constitutional law. Mark packs quite a bit into a short essay. Here’s an excerpt:
There is much to be said for the need to expand our quest for meaning beyond mere words to include the historical context and theological presuppositions/framework of the writers. To fixate too narrowly on the words is often to miss the forest for the trees, theologically speaking. And for dispensationalists who live in perpetual suspicion of “theological systems,” this threat is a real one.
The New Atlantis Report on Sexuality and Gender
A couple of quotations:
You can download a PDF of the report here.
Catch Al Mohler’s comments here.
Ralph Turk
While he never attended Central Seminary, Ralph Turk pastored in Minnesota and was for a while part of the Central Seminary environment. He was also one of the professors, and briefly dean, at the seminary I attended. One of the most memorable courses I ever took was a seminar in Kierkegaard that Turk hosted in his living room. It’s gratifying to see our friends at Dispensational Publishing House giving him some recognition and publishing some of his shorter work. Here are his “Ten Principles for Life and Living.”
InterVarsity Position Statement on Human Sexuality
This position is also going to determine employment with IVCF, according to Time. Download the position paper at Scribd. Here is a sample.
It is important to distinguish between attraction and sexual behavior. Jesus was “tempted in every way, just as we are—yet he did not sin” (Hebrews 4:15). Presumably, this included the experience of sexual attraction. Sexual attraction, whether opposite-sex or same-sex, is clearly not sin, unless it turns into lust or improper sexual behavior (Matthew 5:27-28). Certainly, not crossing over the line into temptation is something we all struggle with. Specifically relating to same-sex attraction, the late apologist John Stott put it this way: “We . . . distinguish between a homosexual inclination . . . and homosexual physical practices” (Same-Sex Partnerships?).
Some devout believers are same-sex-attracted but seek to remain celibate (see Wesley Hill’s Washed and Waiting and Michael Ford’s Wounded Prophet: A Portrait of Henri J. M. Nouwen). They merit our praise. We can fail them by (1) acting as if we have it all together and are not broken in our own sexuality; (2) encouraging them to act unbiblically on their desires; or (3) condemning same-sex attraction as sin.
On its Facebook page, InterVarsity added the following response to the Time article.
You may have seen this evening’s article in TIME about InterVarsity.
We’re disappointed that Elizabeth Dias’ headline and article wrongly stated that InterVarsity is firing employees for supporting gay marriage. That is not the case. In fact, InterVarsity doesn’t have a policy regarding employee views on civil marriage.
We know that LGBTQI people have experienced great pain, including much caused by Christians. We also know that we ourselves each need Jesus’ grace daily. So we attempt to walk humbly in this conversation.
We do continue to hold to an orthodox view of human sexuality and Christian marriage, as you can read in our Theology of Human Sexuality Document at the bottom of the article.
That said, we believe Christlikeness, for our part, includes both embracing Scripture’s teachings on human sexuality—uncomfortable and difficult as they may be—as well as upholding the dignity of all people, because we are all made in God’s image.
Some will argue this cannot be done. We believe that we must if we want to be faithful followers of Jesus.
Within InterVarsity and elsewhere in the Church, there are LGBTQI people who agree with this theology, at great personal cost. We are learning together to follow Jesus.
Walter Kaiser on Private Property
From an Old Testament perspective, of course. This is Kaiser, after all. Read the whole paper at the Institute for Faith, Work, and Economics. Here’s an excerpt:
Scripture teaches that possessions and property may be acquired, for example, under certain conditions by way of reward. Thus even the ox is to remain unmuzzled as it tramps out the grain (Deut. 25:4) and mortals are similarly entitled to appropriate rewards for their labors (1 Cor. 9:9–11). Moreover, all deliberate withholding of wages that are due workers are roundly condemned (Lev. 19:13), because fairness and justice demands the proper pay for honest labor. On the other hand, any gains made through dishonesty must not be given any place in a believer’s life (Eph. 4:28; Prov. 11:1; 21:6; Hos. 12:7; Mic. 6:10–11). That is exactly how stealing is defined.
Possessions and property may also be acquired through inheritance (Deut. 21:16; Prov. 19:14), but even here there is a warning against discrimination (Deut. 21:16). Later on in Israel, only the eldest son received a double portion according to the Mosaic legislation, but this seems to be roughly equivalent to our laws that allow for the executor of the will (in addition to being an heir) to receive a larger portion than the other heirs who are required to pay the executor for the work of distributing the contents of the parents’ will.
Finally, possessions or property could be gained by industriousness (Prov. 10:4; 13:4; 14:23), wisdom (Prov. 3:16; 24:3), or by the development of insight (Prov. 14:15). The book of Proverbs, in particular, stressed the merits of doing a job with pride, satisfaction, and excellence (Prov. 12:24).
Young-Earth Creationist Wins Suit
Mark Armitage has been awarded a six-figure settlement for his firing from California State University Northridge. He was fired for publishing findings that supported young-earth creationism. He was told, “We are not going to tolerate your religion in this department.” Read the story at The College Fix.
Charismatic Contradiction
“The incredible irony is that those who talk the most about the Holy Spirit generally deny His true work. They attribute all kinds of human silliness to Him while ignoring the genuine purpose and power of His ministry: freeing sinners from death, giving them everlasting life, regenerating their hearts, transforming their nature, empowering them for spiritual victory, confirming their place in the family of God, interceding for them according to the will of God, sealing them securely for their eternal glory, and promising to raise them to immortality in the future.”
–MacArthur, John F. Strange Fire: The Danger of Offending the Holy Spirit with Counterfeit Worship (p. xvi). Thomas Nelson.
Wayne Grudem Withdraws Endorsement of Trump
This is a theological blog, not a political one. We do take note, however, when a prominent theologian withdraws his endorsement of a presidential candidate.
Joint Catholic-Anglican Declaration
You can read the full text of the joint declaration by Pope Francis and the Archbishop of Canterbury. Here’s what may be the best line:
Much progress has been made concerning many areas that have kept us apart. Yet new circumstances have presented new disagreements among us, particularly regarding the ordination of women and more recent questions regarding human sexuality. Behind these differences lies a perennial question about how authority is exercised in the Christian community. These are today some of the concerns that constitute serious obstacles to our full unity.
The New Criterion and Current Campus Culture
The New Criterion is not a Christian publication–far from it. It is not even a thoroughly conservative publication. But it does take culture and meaning seriously, and it is almost always worth reading. Here is a recent commentary on “Campus hi(s/r)jinks.”
China Imposes New Religious Rules
Read the law here. Excerpts:
Article 4: Individuals and organizations must not create contradictions and conflicts between different religions, within a single religion, or between religious and non-religious citizens; must not advocate religious extremism, and must not use religion to undermine ethnic unity, divide the nation or carry out terrorist activities.
Article 5: All religions shall adhere to the principle of independence and self-governance; religious groups, religious schools, and sites for religious activities and religious affairs are not controlled by foreign forces.
Article 6: All levels of people’s government shall strengthen guidance of religious work, establish religious work mechanisms, and ensure the strength of religious work and necessary conditions for religious work.
The religious affairs department of the people’s government at the county level or above are to lawfully carry out management of religious affairs that involve State or public interests, and the other departments of the people’s government at the county level or above are to be responsible for the management of relevant affairs within the scope of their respective functions and duties.Villagers’ committees and residents’ committees assist people’s governments and relevant departments in managing religious affairs.
All levels of people’s governments shall hear the views of religious groups, religious schools, sites for religious activities, and religious citizens, and coordinate the management of religious affairs so as to provide public services to religious groups, religious schools and sites for religious activities.
Article 19: Religious activity sites include temples, Taoist temples, mosques, churches (hereinafter temples and churches) and other fixed premises for religious activities.
Standards for distinguishing temples and churches and other fixed sites for religious premises are to be formulated by the religious affairs departments of provincial, autonomous region, or directly governed municipality people’s governments, and reported to the religious affairs department under the State Council to be filed for the record.
Article 20: Religious activity sites shall meet the following conditions to be established:
(1) The purpose of their establishment is not contrary to articles 4 and 5 of this Regulation;
(2) The local religious citizens have need to regularly conduct collective religious activities;
(3) there are religious professionals or other personnel meeting the requirements of the religoin who intend to preside over the religious activities;
(4) have the necessary funds from legal sources and channels;
(5) Have a reasonable configuration meeting the requirements of urban and rural planning, and not impeding the ordinary lives and production of surrounding units and residents.
Article 36: Upon affirmation by a religious group and reporting to the religious affairs department of a people’s government at the county level or above to be filed for the record, religious professionals may engage in professional religious activities.
Those that have not obtained or have lost religious professional credentials, must not engage in activity as religious professionals.
Article 40: Collective religious activities of religious citizens shall , in general, be held at religious activity sites, be organized by religious activity sites, religious groups, or religious school organizations; and be presided over by religious professionals or other persons meeting the requirements of that religion’s rules; and conducted according to religious doctrines and canons.
Article 41: Non-religious groups, non-religious schools, and non-religious activity sites, must not hold religious activities, must not accept religious donations, and must not organize citizens leaving the country to participate in religious training, meetings, activities and so forth.
Article 67: Where a religious activities site is established without authorization, or where a religious activity sites site that has had its registration certificates cancelled continues to carry out religious activities, or where a religious school is established without authorization, the religious affairs department, together with the public security organs are to shut it down and confiscate the unlawful gains or illegal assets if any; where the unlawful gains or illegal assets cannot be determined, a fine of up to 50,000 yuan is imposed; the illegal houses or structures, if any, shall be disposed of by the competent department for construction in accordance with law; and where there is conduct in violation of public security management, a public security administrative sanction is be imposed in accordance with law:
Where a non-religious group, non-religious school, or non-religious activity site organizes or holds religious activities or accepts religious donations, the religious affairs department, together with the departments for public security, civil affairs, construction, culture, tourism, cultural artifacts, and so forth, will order it to discontinue the activities and will confiscate the unlawful gains and illegal assets, if any; and may give a fine of between one and three times the value of unlawful gains; where a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law.
Analysis from Christianity Today here.
Religious Liberty In Decline
Trevin Wax suggests four reasons why at Kingdom People. Along the way he draws a useful distinction or two.
Charles Hodge and the Science of Theology
Yes, Charles Hodge spoke of theology as science and the Bible as a storehouse of facts. Is that a problem? Kevin DeYoung answers that question at DeYoung, Restless, and Reformed. (For what it’s worth, I like Hodge about as much as a Baptist dispensationalist can–which is to say, quite a bit.)